![alison hall inside edition alison hall inside edition](https://www.richmondsymphony.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Hall-Alison-photo-e1434987704184.jpg)
One set of tyrannical rules for lowly citizens who pay the freight of government, another set of hypocritical rules for government liars who also operate in secret so it is difficult for ordinary citizens to learn the truth of what is going on behind closed doors. Why do they drag around so long in deciding these cases anyway? This is ridiculous.
![alison hall inside edition alison hall inside edition](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NUsZE12yqE4/maxresdefault.jpg)
They should be forced to accept and promptly rule on all cases in no more than one month, or perhaps even one week, each, with stiff personal penalties if they fail to do so, like fines and jail time. Also the corrupt Supreme Court should not be allowed to pick and choose the cases it accepts. They provided almost unlimited military force and power of government against citizens, with its many guns and weapons pointed directly at those good citizens and taxpayers, but did not provide any quick and practical legal actions against government liars, cheaters and thugs who patently violate our precious Constitution on an hourly basis with impunity. This excellent article, although the subject is quite depressing, illustrates the great failure of the great Founders of America. Perhaps Goldstein here could keep us up-to-date for Judy's latest productions. I always like to listen to Judy Wood she's quite brilliant too bad it seems she does so few vids these days. What Judy presents isn't only mere theory she gots the "facts, Jack." btwn mere "theory" and actual facts which are not theory. But I can understand Judy's attitude which emphasizes her evidence for her quite sound theory.
#ALISON HALL INSIDE EDITION CRACKED#
Judy Wood is great scientist, even excellent philosopher in many ways, but she's cracked when she denies she has "theory," not grasping meaning/definition of the word, "theory." Even so, the "theory" of Wood's is quite informative and worthwhile. Goldstein, here, never hesitates to state premises, and provides quite legitimate criticism, I'd say. "Troll" is better defined rather as someone who isn't sympathetic, even hostile, but refuses to state their premises and motivations–this here, gives more useful meaning to word, "troll," someone who's rather under-handed. I wouldn't say Goldstein is a "troll," unless "troll" is anyone u don't like–a legitimate, but useless definition. "Troll" Ought To Be Defined Properly, Understood For note, NO ONE could possibly lie like "godsend" lies, UNLESS he was a kike himself. Thus lying liar, "godsend" kike, makes use of the subtle equivocation fallacy in order to pretend there are "good" kike filth, like himself, lying for his fellow Jews. But that quote only and merely refers to fact that these Talmudists are, so often, CONVERTS to Talmud and Talmudism, not fm Judea–referring esp.
![alison hall inside edition alison hall inside edition](https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/styles/video_1920x1080/public/images/2018-07/070618-gianthat-1280x720.jpg)
This lying liar of a kike, "godsend," u notice, continues to harp on the "Jews who say they are Jews but are not" quotation fm Book of Revelations. fm Talmudists, irony being that Israel endorses the "orthodox" (Talmudic) Judaism above all, ho ho ho ho. This Jew, "godsend," wants to ignore the satanic Talmud, pretending "zionists" are essentially diff. More lies, we see, fm the lying kike ("godsend"–ho ho ho, what a name, and aren't we blessed? ho ho ho), who continues pushing the "good Jew, bad Jew" meme, fallacy–as if there are "good" psychopaths, satanists, or Christ-killers. "Godsend" Kike, Pathologic, Inveterate, Sublime Liar Who Lies, Making Use Of Equivocation Fallacy The book’s cover was the first that I attached, but I also featured Exhibit 26, which is classic, Shannon Hicks’ “iconic” photograph, the second Shannon Hicks’ photo and a close up of parents in the background, lounging at the massacre, about which I had published my latest blog:
![alison hall inside edition alison hall inside edition](https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/styles/video_1920x1080/public/images/2018-06/060118-dnatest-1280x720.jpg)
Giving it some thought, I supposed it would be appropriate for me to send her some of the photos we have acquired along the way, in case they might want to use them. Correspondence with AlisonĪlison had actually already reached me by phone before I saw her email inquiry. I would soon discover how wrong I had been. When he asked me recently, “How many inquiries have you had?”, I had to admit that the number was “Zero!” So this looked like it might be an exception to the rule. A media expert, for example, sent a detailed introduction to the book to 1,500 venues across the country, which invited them to contact me for an interview. That sounded fine to me, since it meant that we are beginning to break through the curtain of silence that has been imposed by the media on NOBODY DIED.